<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>05594nam a22006377u 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">pwiiw0186</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260518120055.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">080501t2008    au ||||| |||||||| ||ger d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">OSt</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ger</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">P2</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">O57</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">E17</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">O4</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">jelc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Astrov, Vasily</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">MOEL: Wachstumsvorsprung gegen&#xFC;ber Westeuropa bleibt erhalten</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Wien :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Wiener Institut f&#xFC;r Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche (wiiw),</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2008.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">16 S., </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">8 Tables and 3 Figures,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">30cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">wiiw Research Reports in German Language</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">2008-05</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Zusammenfassung



Die MOEL verzeichneten 2007 erneut ein kr&#xE4;ftiges Wirtschaftswachstum. In den neuen EU-L&#xE4;ndern in Mitteleuropa, deren Expansion prim&#xE4;r durch die Re-Industrialisierung gepr&#xE4;gt ist, war ein Anstieg der Besch&#xE4;ftigung zu beobachten. In den anderen MOEL wurde die Entwicklung jedoch vor allem vom Dienstleistungssektor getragen und basierte nach wie vor teilweise auf der Ausweitung der Kreditvergabe der Banken, die allerdings in mehreren L&#xE4;ndern etwas gebremst wurde. Die Folgen der weltweiten Finanzmarktturbulenzen und eine Wachstumsverlangsamung in Westeuropa d&#xFC;rften die Konjunkturaussichten der MOEL nur unwesentlich d&#xE4;mpfen; der latente Arbeitskr&#xE4;ftemangel und anhaltender Inflationsdruck aufgrund der Verteuerung von Energie und Agrarprodukten auf dem Weltmarkt k&#xF6;nnten sich jedoch mittelfristig als Wachstumshemmnis erweisen.





English Summary

CEEC Growth Still Overtakes Western Europe - Summary



Economic growth in Central and East European countries (CEECs) in 2007 was driven primarily by strong domestic demand, especially for consumer goods. The latter resulted from both higher incomes (particularly in Central Europe's new EU countries) and expanding household credit (elsewhere), although the pace of credit expansion has slowed down somewhat, not least due to government efforts to avoid excessive 'overheating'. Another distinction between these two country groups has been in the sectoral patterns of growth: the main growth engine was industry in the Central European new EU countries and the services sector elsewhere.



The higher world prices for food and energy and further tightening of domestic labour markets led to mounting inflationary pressures. The latter proved to be particularly strong in the poorer CEECs, but was mitigated by an ongoing currency appreciation in Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. The recent surge in inflation is unwelcome news for the new EU countries aiming to join the European Monetary Union soon (especially the Baltic states, but in the longer term also Bulgaria and Romania); only Slovakia has a realistic chance to join the euro zone already at the beginning of 2009 as aspired to by the country's government. At the same time, higher inflation and further budget consolidation have improved the fiscal performance of several new EU countries; the latter is no longer a formal obstacle to adopting the euro (with the exception of Hungary). In contrast, fiscal policy in Russia and Ukraine has been somewhat loosened. Russia's sovereign oil fund, which has been booming recently thanks to soaring world crude prices, is being increasingly spent on industrial policy, aimed at diversifying the country's economic structure away from energy.



The current turbulence in the global financial markets and a slowdown in Western Europe should dampen the CEECs' growth prospects in 2008 only marginally. The speed of their real convergence to the EU 15 will most probably stay at around 3.5 percentage points on average. Hungary's economic growth should even pick up slightly, as consumer demand will gradually recover from the adverse effects of last year's budget consolidation. At the same time, in Latvia and Estonia, 'hard landing' following a protracted period of demand overheating appears inevitable. The prospects of EU accession for a number of Southeast European countries have recently improved and should contribute to the region's overall stability and economic development. However, Serbia might suffer from the recent 'Kosovo crisis' and the potentially destabilizing consequences of the recent fiscal loosening ahead of the parliamentary elections in May 2008, whereas Turkey remains vulnerable to fluctuations in the world financial markets.
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">transitional economies</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">comparative study</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">economic growth</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">fiscal and monetary policy</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">macroeconomic forecast</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">macroeconomic analysis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Albania</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bosnia and Herzegovina</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bulgaria</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Croatia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Czechia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Estonia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Hungary</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kazakhstan</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Latvia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lithuania</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">North Macedonia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Montenegro</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Poland</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Romania</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Russia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Serbia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Slovakia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Slovenia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Turkey</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ukraine</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Baltic States</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SEE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Visegrad countries</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Macroeconomic Analysis and Policy</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">International Trade, Competitiveness and FDI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">International Trade, Competitiveness and FDI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Labour, Migration and Income Distribution</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Macroeconomic Analysis and Policy</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="v">2008-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">WIIW0000108</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">wiiw Research Reports in German Language</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="u">https://wiiw.ac.at/p-186.html</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">P</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">8587</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">8587</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BIB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BIB</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2008-05-01</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">pwiiw0186</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">1000010000186</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2008-05-01 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2018-11-21</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">P</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
